‹ Darji - Tailor Shop Management SystemQuality report QR-26-00046

Darji - Tailor Shop Management System
Full-source tailor shop management: orders, measurements, payments, staff, stock, reports. Laravel API + React SPA.
- Product ID
- B0055-52181
- Builder
- Asad
- Version reviewed
- 1.0.0 · released 18 Oct 2026
- Stack
- Laravel 13 · PHP 8.3 · MySQL 5.7 / MariaDB 10.4 / SQLite 3
- Built with
- Claude Code
- Review period
- 17 Oct 2026 – 19 Oct 2026 · 2 rounds of changes
- ✓AI code audit6 checks · 17 Oct 2026
- ✓Installed & run19 Oct 2026
- ✓Demo vs delivered19 Oct 2026
- ✓Final sign-off19 Oct 2026
At a glance
- ✓Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
- ✓Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
- !13 of 15 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
- ✓Security scored 87/100 with no failing check.
- !5 open warnings — explained in part 1.
AI code audit
The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.
| Check | What we found | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secrets & credentials | No real credentials found. Docker Compose and setup documentation contain weak default passwords ('change-me-darji', 'change-me-root') that ship to buyers. These should be randomized on first run or require explicit user configuration. The .env.example file correctly uses placeholders. | 92 | Warning |
| Dependency vulnerabilities | Both composer.lock and package-lock.json are present. No known critical vulnerabilities detected in production dependencies. Several packages are outdated (Laravel Pint 1.27 vs 1.18+, Vite 8.0.0 vs 6.x stable, React 19.2.0 is current). The project uses pre-release/beta versions of some packages (vite-plus 0.3.0, Laravel Chisel 0.1.0, Wayfinder 0.1.14) which is acceptable for a new product but should be monitored. | 85 | Warning |
| Authorisation & access control | All create/update/delete endpoints are protected by Sanctum authentication and permission checks. Password hashing uses bcrypt. A few read-only endpoints (customer lookup, staff workload, order board) lack ownership checks, allowing authenticated users to see data across the shop. These are low-risk in a single-shop context but should validate user scope. | 92 | Warning |
| Database access rules | The schema is complete and uses parameterized queries throughout. However, multiple foreign-key columns lack indexes (order_items.order_id, payments.order_id, stock_movements.inventory_item_id, etc.), which will cause performance issues as data grows. One delete statement in OrderService lacks a WHERE clause guard. No SQL injection vulnerabilities detected. | 78 | Warning |
| Code structure & duplication | The codebase demonstrates solid architectural boundaries with clear separation between API controllers, requests, resources, and services. However, there is notable duplication in password validation rules, some utility files are growing large, and a few hard-coded values should be extracted to configuration. | 78 | Warning |
| Build reproducibility | The project is fully reproducible from source with clear setup instructions. Composer and npm dependencies resolve correctly, migrations create the schema, and the web installer completes the setup. Minor issues: Docker compose references a non-existent Dockerfile, and HowToSetup.md doesn't specify the Node.js version requirement clearly enough. | 92 | Pass |
Open warnings
Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.
No real credentials found. Docker Compose and setup documentation contain weak default passwords ('change-me-darji', 'change-me-root') that ship to buyers. These should be randomized on first run or require explicit user configuration. The .env.example file correctly uses placeholders.
All create/update/delete endpoints are protected by Sanctum authentication and permission checks. Password hashing uses bcrypt. A few read-only endpoints (customer lookup, staff workload, order board) lack ownership checks, allowing authenticated users to see data across the shop. These are low-risk in a single-shop context but should validate user scope.
The codebase demonstrates solid architectural boundaries with clear separation between API controllers, requests, resources, and services. However, there is notable duplication in password validation rules, some utility files are growing large, and a few hard-coded values should be extracted to configuration.
Both composer.lock and package-lock.json are present. No known critical vulnerabilities detected in production dependencies. Several packages are outdated (Laravel Pint 1.27 vs 1.18+, Vite 8.0.0 vs 6.x stable, React 19.2.0 is current). The project uses pre-release/beta versions of some packages (vite-plus 0.3.0, Laravel Chisel 0.1.0, Wayfinder 0.1.14) which is acceptable for a new product but should be monitored.
The schema is complete and uses parameterized queries throughout. However, multiple foreign-key columns lack indexes (order_items.order_id, payments.order_id, stock_movements.inventory_item_id, etc.), which will cause performance issues as data grows. One delete statement in OrderService lacks a WHERE clause guard. No SQL injection vulnerabilities detected.
Requirement list
What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 13 of 15 met.
- Complete source for every component Met
- No real credentials in the archive Met
- Builds from a clean machine Met
- Database script or migrations Met
- Authentication and roles on every mutating endpoint Partial
- Pinned dependencies without critical CVEs (nice)Partial
- Documentation set (nice)Met
- Working live demo Met
- README.md Met
- HowToSetup.md Met
- CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md) (nice)Met
- CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
- .env.example Met
- a project file Met
- a project file (nice)Met
Human review
Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.
Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code
Completed 19 Oct 2026A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.
| Question | Answer | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|
| Packages restored without errors | Yes | |
| Solution builds clean | Yes | |
| Database created from the shipped script or migrations | Yes | |
| First sign-in works with the documented steps | Yes | |
| Setup guide is accurate and complete | Yes | |
| Every module in the feature list opens and works | Yes | |
| No real secrets in the archive | Yes | |
| Branding and company details can be changed without code | Yes |
Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code
Completed 19 Oct 2026A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.
| Question | Answer | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|
| Demo URL is reachable | Yes | |
| Demo credentials work | Yes | |
| Demo runs the same version as the archive | Yes | |
| All five differentiators are visible in the demo | Yes | |
| Screenshots match the demo | Yes | |
| Nothing in the demo is missing from the code | Yes | |
| Datasheet claims are accurate | Yes |
Changes asked for during review
- Round 1: changes requested on 19 Oct 2026; the builder fixed them and uploaded again.
- Sign-off: approved for sale on 19 Oct 2026 with 5 warnings shown publicly.
What this report covers — and what it doesn't
- It covers version 1.0.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
- It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
- Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
- Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
- How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
- Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.
Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.