Hotel Manager — quality report QR-26-00053 | Vibe96

‹ Hotel ManagerQuality report QR-26-00053

Hotel Manager
Vibe96 quality report

Hotel Manager

Room booking, seasonal rates, check-in/out and guest folios for small hotels and guest houses

Product ID
B0344-22364
Builder
Infymerce
Version reviewed
1.0.0 · released 23 Oct 2026
Stack
Laravel 13 + Filament 5 · PHP 8.3+ · MySQL 8 / MariaDB 10.6+ or SQLite
Built with
OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot
Review period
20 Oct 2026 – 23 Oct 2026 · 1 round of changes
89out of 100 Passed with 5 warningsPass mark 75 and no failing check.

Scores

Security96
Code structure78
Docs & completeness100
Dependency health85
Build & deploy72
  1. AI code audit6 checks · 20 Oct 2026
  2. Installed & run23 Oct 2026
  3. Demo vs delivered23 Oct 2026
  4. Final sign-off23 Oct 2026

At a glance

  • Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
  • Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
  • 15 of 15 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
  • Security scored 96/100 with no failing check.
  • 5 open warnings — explained in part 1.
Part 1

AI code audit

The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.

CheckWhat we foundScoreResult
Secrets & credentialsAll sensitive configuration is properly externalized to environment variables. The .env.example file contains only placeholders and instructions. Database passwords, admin passwords, and API keys are all loaded from environment variables with clear documentation.100Pass
Dependency vulnerabilitiesAll dependency manifests and lockfiles are present. No known critical vulnerabilities detected in the installed versions. A few packages could be updated to latest versions, but all are within safe ranges. The project uses stable releases with proper version pinning in lockfiles.85Warning
Authorisation & access controlAll admin routes are protected by Filament's authentication and policies. Public booking requests are rate-limited and validated. The guest folio page (/stay/{reservation}) uses a signed URL but does not verify the guest owns that reservation—any signed link works for any reservation. Passwords are hashed with bcrypt. No unguarded admin or mutating endpoints found.95Warning
Database access rulesNo SQL injection or unscoped deletes found. All queries use Eloquent or safe bindings. Schema has proper foreign keys with cascades. Missing indexes on several foreign key columns (room_type_id, guest_id, reservation_id) and date range queries (check_in/check_out) that will slow down availability searches and reporting as data grows.92Warning
Code structure & duplicationThe codebase demonstrates solid architectural patterns with clear service layer separation and policy-based authorization. However, there is some duplication in validation logic across controllers, hard-coded configuration values scattered in code, and a few oversized resource classes that could benefit from refactoring.78Warning
Build reproducibilityThe project can be built from source with Docker or locally, but HowToSetup.md has ordering issues and omissions. The Docker setup works but certificate instructions are vague. Local setup mentions seeding but doesn't clarify when demo data loads versus production admin-only. The composer setup script references npm but package-lock shows audit vulnerabilities that should be addressed.72Warning

Open warnings

Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.

Warning 1 Dependencies are current; no known critical vulnerabilities found

All dependency manifests and lockfiles are present. No known critical vulnerabilities detected in the installed versions. A few packages could be updated to latest versions, but all are within safe ranges. The project uses stable releases with proper version pinning in lockfiles.

Warning 2 Good separation of concerns with minor duplication and some hard-coded values

The codebase demonstrates solid architectural patterns with clear service layer separation and policy-based authorization. However, there is some duplication in validation logic across controllers, hard-coded configuration values scattered in code, and a few oversized resource classes that could benefit from refactoring.

Warning 3 Strong authentication on all mutating routes; minor ownership gap on guest folio read

All admin routes are protected by Filament's authentication and policies. Public booking requests are rate-limited and validated. The guest folio page (/stay/{reservation}) uses a signed URL but does not verify the guest owns that reservation—any signed link works for any reservation. Passwords are hashed with bcrypt. No unguarded admin or mutating endpoints found.

Warning 4 Schema solid, minor indexing gaps on foreign keys and date lookups

No SQL injection or unscoped deletes found. All queries use Eloquent or safe bindings. Schema has proper foreign keys with cascades. Missing indexes on several foreign key columns (room_type_id, guest_id, reservation_id) and date range queries (check_in/check_out) that will slow down availability searches and reporting as data grows.

Warning 5 Build reproducible with gaps: missing npm audit fix, unclear cert setup, no DB seed clarity

The project can be built from source with Docker or locally, but HowToSetup.md has ordering issues and omissions. The Docker setup works but certificate instructions are vague. Local setup mentions seeding but doesn't clarify when demo data loads versus production admin-only. The composer setup script references npm but package-lock shows audit vulnerabilities that should be addressed.

Requirement list

What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 15 of 15 met.

  • Complete source for every component Met
  • No real credentials in the archive Met
  • Builds from a clean machine Met
  • Database script or migrations Met
  • Authentication and roles on every mutating endpoint Met
  • Pinned dependencies without critical CVEs (nice)Met
  • Documentation set (nice)Met
  • Working live demo Met
  • README.md Met
  • HowToSetup.md Met
  • CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md) (nice)Met
  • CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
  • .env.example Met
  • a project file Met
  • a project file (nice)Met
Part 2

Human review

Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.

Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code

Completed 23 Oct 2026

A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Packages restored without errorsYes
Solution builds cleanYes
Database created from the shipped script or migrationsYes
First sign-in works with the documented stepsYes
Setup guide is accurate and completeYes
Every module in the feature list opens and worksYes
No real secrets in the archiveYes
Branding and company details can be changed without codeYes

Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code

Completed 23 Oct 2026

A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Demo URL is reachableYes
Demo credentials workYes
Demo runs the same version as the archiveYes
All five differentiators are visible in the demoYes
Screenshots match the demoYes
Nothing in the demo is missing from the codeYes
Datasheet claims are accurateYes

Changes asked for during review

  • Round 1: changes requested on 22 Oct 2026; the builder fixed them and uploaded again.
  • Sign-off: approved for sale on 23 Oct 2026 with 5 warnings shown publicly.

What this report covers — and what it doesn't

  • It covers version 1.0.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
  • It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
  • Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
  • Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
  • How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
  • Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.

Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.