Carepoint Clinic Booking & SMS Reminders — quality report QR-26-00112 | Vibe96

‹ Carepoint Clinic Booking & SMS RemindersQuality report QR-26-00112

Carepoint Clinic Booking & SMS Reminders
Vibe96 quality report

Carepoint Clinic Booking & SMS Reminders

Clinic booking and front-desk management for medical, dental, and therapy practices.

Product ID
B0549-95447
Builder
Raj's Builder Studio
Version reviewed
1.0.0 · released 10 Nov 2026
Stack
Express 5.1.0 (with helmet 8.3.0) · JavaScript (Node.js 22.23.4) · PostgreSQL 16 (16.15 in Docker Compose)
Built with
OpenAI Codex, Claude Code
Review period
4 Nov 2026 – 10 Nov 2026 · 2 rounds of changes
85out of 100 Passed with 2 warningsPass mark 75 and no failing check.

Scores

Security89
Code structure70
Docs & completeness80
Dependency health88
Build & deploy80
  1. AI code audit6 checks · 4 Nov 2026
  2. Installed & run10 Nov 2026
  3. Demo vs delivered10 Nov 2026
  4. Final sign-off10 Nov 2026

At a glance

  • Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
  • Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
  • 20 of 25 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
  • Security scored 89/100 with no failing check.
  • 2 open warnings — explained in part 1.
Part 1

AI code audit

The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.

CheckWhat we foundScoreResult
Secrets & credentialsEvery regex candidate is either a runtime token variable, a request-body field, or an environment reference. The .env.example holds clearly labeled placeholders, and docker-compose.yml requires SESSION_SECRET and POSTGRES_PASSWORD from .env with no defaults. The only remaining concern is that the files after docker-compose.yml's db service were not fully visible, so those could not be checked.94Pass
Dependency vulnerabilitiesThe project has one manifest (package.json) with three exact-pinned production dependencies (express 5.1.0, helmet 8.3.0, pg 8.16.3) and a committed package-lock.json. No wildcard or pre-release versions are present, and I know of no critical advisory for the pinned versions. Minor concerns: the lockfile contents were not visible, and some pins may be slightly behind current patch releases.88Pass
Authorisation & access controlEvery visible mutating and admin route uses authenticate plus an explicit role check, and ownership is enforced in SQL with clinic scoping. Passwords use salted scrypt with timing-safe compare. Minor gaps: a few routes were truncated and could not be verified, and some role checks are done inline, not through middleware.88Pass
Database access rulesAll visible queries use $n placeholders, and the dynamic fragments (scope, $${values.length}) are built from fixed server-side strings, not user input. Destructive statements are scoped by clinic and owner. The schema files were not in the excerpt, so foreign keys, cascades and indexes could only be checked through README claims, and a few routes pass unvalidated IDs to uuid-typed parameters.84Warning
Code structure & duplicationChecked by our reviewers during the human review.70Warning
Build reproducibilityThe package.json, lockfile, .nvmrc, Dockerfiles and compose appear coherent, with pinned digests and an explicit db:setup step. However, HowToSetup.md and the Dockerfiles were not in the digest, so setup order could not be verified. A committed 4.5 MB upload zip and a version mismatch add clutter.80Warning

Open warnings

Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.

Warning 1 Mostly reproducible; HowToSetup.md and Dockerfiles unseen, committed zip and version mismatch are gaps

The package.json, lockfile, .nvmrc, Dockerfiles and compose appear coherent, with pinned digests and an explicit db:setup step. However, HowToSetup.md and the Dockerfiles were not in the digest, so setup order could not be verified. A committed 4.5 MB upload zip and a version mismatch add clutter.

Warning 2 SQL is parameterized and tenant-scoped; schema review is limited and a few input checks are missing

All visible queries use $n placeholders, and the dynamic fragments (scope, $${values.length}) are built from fixed server-side strings, not user input. Destructive statements are scoped by clinic and owner. The schema files were not in the excerpt, so foreign keys, cascades and indexes could only be checked through README claims, and a few routes pass unvalidated IDs to uuid-typed parameters.

Requirement list

What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 20 of 25 met.

  • Complete source for every part Met
  • No real credentials Met
  • Exactly one example config file Partial
  • Pinned dependencies with lockfile Partial
  • PostgreSQL schema creates from empty Met
  • HowToSetup.md with two targets Partial
  • Authorisation on every write route Met
  • Working demo account on live URL Partial
  • README.md with the five differentiators Met
  • CLAUDE.md architecture guide (nice)Met
  • CHANGELOG.md starting at 1.0.0 (nice)Partial
  • Seed data (nice)Met
  • docker-compose.yml (nice)Met
  • README.md Met
  • HowToSetup.md Met
  • .env.example Met
  • Clinic Booking a project file Met
  • Clinic Booking a project file Met
  • a project file Met
  • LICENSE-NOTE.md Met
  • CLAUDE.md (nice)Met
  • CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
  • a project file (nice)Met
  • docker-compose.yml (nice)Met
  • docs/ (optional)Met
Part 2

Human review

Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.

Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code

Completed 10 Nov 2026

A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Packages restored without errorsYes
Solution builds cleanYes
Database created from the shipped script or migrationsYes
First sign-in works with the documented stepsYes
Setup guide is accurate and completeYes
Every module in the feature list opens and worksYes
No real secrets in the archiveYes
Branding and company details can be changed without codeYes

Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code

Completed 10 Nov 2026

A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Demo URL is reachableYes
Demo credentials workYes
Demo runs the same version as the archiveYes
All five differentiators are visible in the demoYes
Screenshots match the demoYes
Nothing in the demo is missing from the codeYes
Datasheet claims are accurateYes

Changes asked for during review

  • Round 1: changes requested on 9 Nov 2026; the builder fixed them and uploaded again.
  • Sign-off: approved for sale on 10 Nov 2026 with 2 warnings shown publicly.

What this report covers — and what it doesn't

  • It covers version 1.0.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
  • It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
  • Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
  • Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
  • How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
  • Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.

Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.