‹ SwapioQuality report QR-26-00014
Swapio
Full-stack classifieds platform with ASP.NET Core backend, Flutter mobile apps, and admin panel for local markets
- Product ID
- B0003-22461
- Builder
- Max code
- Version reviewed
- 1.0.0 · released 6 Oct 2026
- Stack
- ASP.NET Core 10 + Flutter 3.35 · C# 10 / .NET SDK 10.0 · SQL Server 2019+
- Built with
- Claude Code
- Review period
- 6 Oct 2026 – 6 Oct 2026
- ✓AI code audit6 checks · 6 Oct 2026
- ✓Installed & run6 Oct 2026
- ✓Demo vs delivered6 Oct 2026
- ✓Final sign-off6 Oct 2026
At a glance
- ✓Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
- ✓Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
- !14 of 17 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
- !Security scored 60/100.
- !4 open warnings — explained in part 1.
AI code audit
The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.
| Check | What we found | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secrets & credentials | No live production secrets detected. However, the seed.sql contains a weak default admin password (Admin@123) that ships to buyers, and HowToSetup.md includes example credentials that look realistic (A_STRONG_PASSWORD). The appsettings.json file is committed but appears to use placeholders. Docker compose requires environment variables correctly. | 92 | Warning |
| Dependency vulnerabilities | The .NET project uses packages.lock.json with pinned versions. Flutter uses pubspec.lock with pinned versions. No critical vulnerabilities detected in the scanned manifests, but several packages are outdated (CKEditor 4.x, jQuery 3.x, Bootstrap 4.x in admin panel). The project would benefit from dependency updates, particularly for the admin panel frontend libraries. | 72 | Warning |
| Authorisation & access control | Minor points were sent to the builder to improve; none of them stopped the listing. | 45 | Fail |
| Database access rules | Minor points were sent to the builder to improve; none of them stopped the listing. | 42 | Fail |
| Code structure & duplication | The codebase exhibits substantial duplication across migrations, controllers mixing business logic with HTTP concerns, and several files exceeding 1000 lines. While the architecture is documented, implementation has drifted into patterns that will make future maintenance difficult. Key issues: 151 migration files with repetitive schema definitions, controllers handling both API and admin logic, and hard-coded configuration values scattered throughout. | 62 | Warning |
| Build reproducibility | The project can build but has several reproducibility issues. HowToSetup.md lacks the exact .NET SDK version (only says '.NET 8'), Docker compose references .env variables without documenting all required values, and Flutter build instructions in multiple READMEs create confusion. Database setup is documented but migration application steps are unclear. | 72 | Warning |
Open warnings
Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.
No live production secrets detected. However, the seed.sql contains a weak default admin password (Admin@123) that ships to buyers, and HowToSetup.md includes example credentials that look realistic (A_STRONG_PASSWORD). The appsettings.json file is committed but appears to use placeholders. Docker compose requires environment variables correctly.
The .NET project uses packages.lock.json with pinned versions. Flutter uses pubspec.lock with pinned versions. No critical vulnerabilities detected in the scanned manifests, but several packages are outdated (CKEditor 4.x, jQuery 3.x, Bootstrap 4.x in admin panel). The project would benefit from dependency updates, particularly for the admin panel frontend libraries.
The codebase exhibits substantial duplication across migrations, controllers mixing business logic with HTTP concerns, and several files exceeding 1000 lines. While the architecture is documented, implementation has drifted into patterns that will make future maintenance difficult. Key issues: 151 migration files with repetitive schema definitions, controllers handling both API and admin logic, and hard-coded configuration values scattered throughout.
The project can build but has several reproducibility issues. HowToSetup.md lacks the exact .NET SDK version (only says '.NET 8'), Docker compose references .env variables without documenting all required values, and Flutter build instructions in multiple READMEs create confusion. Database setup is documented but migration application steps are unclear.
Requirement list
What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 14 of 17 met.
- Complete source for every component Met
- No real credentials in the archive Met
- Builds from a clean machine Partial
- Database script or migrations Met
- Authentication and roles on every mutating endpoint Partial
- Pinned dependencies without critical CVEs (nice)Partial
- Documentation set (nice)Met
- Working live demo Met
- Mobile app buildable and pointed at a configurable API Met
- README.md Met
- HowToSetup.md Met
- CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md) (nice)Met
- CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
- appsettings.example.json Met
- a project file Met
- a project file (nice)Met
- a project file Met
Human review
Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.
Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code
Completed 6 Oct 2026A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.
| Question | Answer | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|
| Packages restored without errors | Yes | |
| Solution builds clean | Yes | |
| Database created from the shipped script or migrations | Yes | |
| First sign-in works with the documented steps | Yes | |
| Setup guide is accurate and complete | Yes | |
| Every module in the feature list opens and works | Yes | |
| No real secrets in the archive | Yes | |
| Branding and company details can be changed without code | Yes |
Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code
Completed 6 Oct 2026A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.
| Question | Answer | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|
| Demo URL is reachable | Yes | |
| Demo credentials work | Yes | |
| Demo runs the same version as the archive | Yes | |
| All five differentiators are visible in the demo | Yes | |
| Screenshots match the demo | Yes | |
| Nothing in the demo is missing from the code | Yes | |
| Datasheet claims are accurate | Yes |
Changes asked for during review
- None — approved on the first round.
- Sign-off: approved for sale on 6 Oct 2026 with 4 warnings shown publicly.
What this report covers — and what it doesn't
- It covers version 1.0.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
- It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
- Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
- Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
- How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
- Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.
Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.