Haven — Small Hotel Front Desk & Room Booking — quality report QR-26-00066 | Vibe96

‹ Haven — Small Hotel Front Desk & Room BookingQuality report QR-26-00066

Haven — Small Hotel Front Desk & Room Booking
Vibe96 quality report

Haven — Small Hotel Front Desk & Room Booking

Front-desk software for independent hotels with 5–50 rooms, managing reservations, check-ins and guest payments.

Product ID
B0183-36274
Builder
Redowan Ahmed Farhan
Version reviewed
1.0.0 · released 26 Oct 2026
Stack
React 19.3.1 + Vite 8.0.0 · JavaScript (Node.js 24+) · SQLite bundled with Node.js 24+; optional Neon PostgreSQL 17 (verified)
Built with
OpenAI Codex
Review period
24 Oct 2026 – 26 Oct 2026
94out of 100 Passed with 2 warningsPass mark 75 and no failing check.

Scores

Security96
Code structure82
Docs & completeness87
Dependency health95
Build & deploy95
  1. AI code audit6 checks · 24 Oct 2026
  2. Installed & run26 Oct 2026
  3. Demo vs delivered26 Oct 2026
  4. Final sign-off26 Oct 2026

At a glance

  • Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
  • Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
  • 13 of 15 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
  • Security scored 96/100 with no failing check.
  • 2 open warnings — explained in part 1.
Part 1

AI code audit

The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.

CheckWhat we foundScoreResult
Secrets & credentialsAll credential references are either placeholders ([hidden], SESSION_SECRET=, your-verified-domain.com) or environment variable instructions. The regex candidates flagged documentation patterns and Docker Compose variable syntax, not actual secrets. No committed .env files, API keys, or connection strings with real values were found.100Pass
Dependency vulnerabilitiesAll production dependencies are pinned in package-lock.json with no known critical vulnerabilities. React 19.3.1, Vite 8.0.0, and other packages are current stable releases. Minor outdated devDependencies (Playwright 1.64.1 vs 1.49+, ESLint 10.13.0 vs 10.18+) are acceptable for a recent project.95Pass
Authorisation & access controlAll data-changing endpoints require signed admin session with proper bcrypt password hashing. Login is rate-limited. The only gap is that authenticated users can read any guest record by ID without ownership checks, though this is a single-admin system where all staff share one password.95Warning
Database access rulesSQL queries use parameterized statements throughout, preventing injection. Schema has proper foreign keys and constraints. However, foreign key columns lack explicit indexes in SQLite/Postgres schemas, and one DELETE statement in server.mjs lacks a WHERE clause (though it's scoped by table design). These are performance and safety warnings, not critical flaws.92Warning
Code structure & duplicationThe project demonstrates good separation of concerns with clear module boundaries: frontend components, server routes, storage layer, and tests are appropriately isolated. Files are reasonably sized and focused. Minor issues include duplicated documentation files across directories and some configuration duplication in .env.example files, which do not impact production code quality.82Pass
Build reproducibilityThe project is fully reproducible with consistent dependencies and proper exclusions. All package references resolve, Docker configuration is coherent, and build artifacts are excluded. Minor issues: HowToSetup.md is missing from Node Project folder (only in docs/), and the setup document could clarify the .env configuration step happens before npm ci.95Pass

Open warnings

Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.

Warning 1 Strong authentication on all mutating endpoints; minor ownership gap on guest reads

All data-changing endpoints require signed admin session with proper bcrypt password hashing. Login is rate-limited. The only gap is that authenticated users can read any guest record by ID without ownership checks, though this is a single-admin system where all staff share one password.

Warning 2 Database access is mostly safe; missing foreign key indexes and one unscoped DELETE

SQL queries use parameterized statements throughout, preventing injection. Schema has proper foreign keys and constraints. However, foreign key columns lack explicit indexes in SQLite/Postgres schemas, and one DELETE statement in server.mjs lacks a WHERE clause (though it's scoped by table design). These are performance and safety warnings, not critical flaws.

Requirement list

What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 13 of 15 met.

  • Complete source for every component Met
  • No real credentials in the archive Met
  • Builds from a clean machine Met
  • Database script or migrations Met
  • Authentication and roles on every mutating endpoint Partial
  • Pinned dependencies without critical CVEs (nice)Partial
  • Documentation set (nice)Met
  • Working live demo Met
  • README.md Met
  • HowToSetup.md Met
  • CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md) (nice)Met
  • CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
  • .env.example Met
  • a project file Met
  • a project file (nice)Met
Part 2

Human review

Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.

Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code

Completed 26 Oct 2026

A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Packages restored without errorsYes
Solution builds cleanYes
Database created from the shipped script or migrationsYes
First sign-in works with the documented stepsYes
Setup guide is accurate and completeYes
Every module in the feature list opens and worksYes
No real secrets in the archiveYes
Branding and company details can be changed without codeYes

Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code

Completed 26 Oct 2026

A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Demo URL is reachableYes
Demo credentials workYes
Demo runs the same version as the archiveYes
All five differentiators are visible in the demoYes
Screenshots match the demoYes
Nothing in the demo is missing from the codeYes
Datasheet claims are accurateYes

Changes asked for during review

  • None — approved on the first round.
  • Sign-off: approved for sale on 26 Oct 2026 with 2 warnings shown publicly.

What this report covers — and what it doesn't

  • It covers version 1.0.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
  • It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
  • Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
  • Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
  • How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
  • Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.

Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.