CliniCare — Clinic Management SaaS — quality report QR-26-00106 | Vibe96

‹ CliniCare — Clinic Management SaaSQuality report QR-26-00106

CliniCare — Clinic Management SaaS
Vibe96 quality report

CliniCare — Clinic Management SaaS

Multi-tenant clinic management web app for small and mid-sized private clinics, built on React and Supabase.

Product ID
B0308-87960
Builder
Jehan Ahmed
Version reviewed
1.0.0 · released 6 Nov 2026
Stack
React 18.3.1 + Vite 6.4 + Tailwind CSS 4.3 (shadcn-style UI) · TypeScript 5.9 (React 18.3 front end) · PostgreSQL via Supabase (minimum version not stated in the digest)
Built with
Claude Code
Review period
4 Nov 2026 – 6 Nov 2026
74out of 100 Listed after a manual reviewPass mark 75 and no failing check.

Scores

Security70
Code structure72
Docs & completeness55
Dependency health82
Build & deploy82
  1. AI code audit6 checks · 4 Nov 2026
  2. Installed & run6 Nov 2026
  3. Demo vs delivered6 Nov 2026
  4. Final sign-off6 Nov 2026

At a glance

  • Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
  • Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
  • 12 of 22 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
  • Security scored 70/100 with no failing check.
  • 4 open warnings — explained in part 1.
Part 1

AI code audit

The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.

CheckWhat we foundScoreResult
Secrets & credentialsThe scan found no real API keys, private keys, or connection strings, and .env.example ships blank. The only candidates are fictional demo-mode logins on .test domains, which are public in the live demo bundle and gate no backend. The one remaining regex hit is a UI token generator, not a secret.90Warning
Dependency vulnerabilitiesThe only manifest is package.json, and package-lock.json is present. Every dependency is pinned to an exact version with no wildcards, ranges, or pre-release builds. The lockfile contents were not available for review, so transitive vulnerabilities could not be checked, and Vite 5.4 and React 18 are behind current majors.82Pass
Authorisation & access controlThis is a client-only Vite SPA with no server routes. Access control rests on a project file and Supabase RLS (sql/migrations, a project file), and neither was included in the excerpts. The docs claim sign-in, role and clinic-scope checks on every write, but that claim could not be confirmed from the code shown.60Warning
Database access rulesThe digest shows no SQL, migrations, or a project file contents, only file names and documentation claims. Documentation says every write checks sign-in, role and clinic scope, with RLS as the backstop, but none of this could be verified. A score above 60 would need evidence of scoped queries, foreign keys and indexes, so this is capped at a cautious warning.60Warning
Code structure & duplicationThe project separates landing, auth, onboarding, demo, lib and UI components cleanly, and the API layer is isolated from views. However, the demo feature sprawls across many files, and the demo store core is a large mixed-concern file, with some hard-coded fictional data and seed values embedded in components. The buyer can work with it, but the structure will be harder to maintain than it needs to be.72Warning
Build reproducibilitypackage.json pins exact dependency versions, declares engines (Node >=20, npm >=10), has build/dev/preview scripts, and ships a lockfile and a blank .env.example. The live demo shows a built Vite bundle served from Netlify, so the build evidently succeeds. Gaps: duplicate SQL sources, an unlisted Supabase function setup, a missing tsconfig verification, and an unverified setup document.82Pass

Open warnings

Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.

Warning 1 No real credentials found; demo login passwords ship as weak defaults in client code

The scan found no real API keys, private keys, or connection strings, and .env.example ships blank. The only candidates are fictional demo-mode logins on .test domains, which are public in the live demo bundle and gate no backend. The one remaining regex hit is a UI token generator, not a secret.

Warning 2 Feature-based layout is sound, but the demo feature is split across 28 files and some stores/files are large

The project separates landing, auth, onboarding, demo, lib and UI components cleanly, and the API layer is isolated from views. However, the demo feature sprawls across many files, and the demo store core is a large mixed-concern file, with some hard-coded fictional data and seed values embedded in components. The buyer can work with it, but the structure will be harder to maintain than it needs to be.

Warning 3 SQL and API code not provided for review; database rules cannot be confirmed from the excerpts

The digest shows no SQL, migrations, or a project file contents, only file names and documentation claims. Documentation says every write checks sign-in, role and clinic scope, with RLS as the backstop, but none of this could be verified. A score above 60 would need evidence of scoped queries, foreign keys and indexes, so this is capped at a cautious warning.

Warning 4 Authz cannot be verified: api.ts, SQL/RLS and edge function not shown; demo role gates are UI-only

This is a client-only Vite SPA with no server routes. Access control rests on a project file and Supabase RLS (sql/migrations, a project file), and neither was included in the excerpts. The docs claim sign-in, role and clinic-scope checks on every write, but that claim could not be confirmed from the code shown.

Requirement list

What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 12 of 22 met.

  • Complete web app source Partial
  • No real credentials Met
  • Exactly one example env file Partial
  • Pinned lockfile Met
  • Database schema creates from empty Partial
  • Row Level Security on every table Partial
  • HowToSetup.md with two targets Partial
  • Reachable demo with sample data Partial
  • README with features and licence note (nice)Partial
  • CLAUDE.md architecture guide (nice)Partial
  • CHANGELOG starting at 1.0.0 (nice)Partial
  • Seed data (nice)Partial
  • README.md Met
  • HowToSetup.md Met
  • React Web a project filee Met
  • React Web a project file Met
  • a project file Met
  • a project file (nice)Met
  • CLAUDE.md (nice)Met
  • CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
  • LICENSE-NOTE.md (optional)Met
  • docs/ (optional)Met
Part 2

Human review

Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.

Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code

Completed 6 Nov 2026

A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Packages restored without errorsYes
Solution builds cleanYes
Database created from the shipped script or migrationsYes
First sign-in works with the documented stepsYes
Setup guide is accurate and completeYes
Every module in the feature list opens and worksYes
No real secrets in the archiveYes
Branding and company details can be changed without codeYes

Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code

Completed 6 Nov 2026

A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.

QuestionAnswerReviewer's note
Demo URL is reachableYes
Demo credentials workYes
Demo runs the same version as the archiveYes
All five differentiators are visible in the demoYes
Screenshots match the demoYes
Nothing in the demo is missing from the codeYes
Datasheet claims are accurateYes

Changes asked for during review

  • None — approved on the first round.
  • Sign-off: approved for sale on 6 Nov 2026 with 4 warnings shown publicly.

What this report covers — and what it doesn't

  • It covers version 1.0.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
  • It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
  • Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
  • Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
  • How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
  • Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.

Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.