‹ FurnivoQuality report QR-26-00108
Furnivo
Self-hosted Laravel ecommerce for luxury furniture with Shopify-style admin, Stripe & multi-currency
- Product ID
- B0001-65228
- Builder
- Buildify
- Version reviewed
- 1.4.0 · released 6 Nov 2026
- Stack
- Laravel 12.69 · PHP 8.2 · MySQL 8.0
- Built with
- Claude Code
- Review period
- 6 Nov 2026 – 6 Nov 2026
- ✓AI code audit6 checks · 6 Nov 2026
- ✓Installed & run6 Nov 2026
- ✓Demo vs delivered6 Nov 2026
- ✓Final sign-off6 Nov 2026
At a glance
- ✓Installed and run from the delivered code — 8 of 8 checks answered yes.
- ✓Live demo compared with the delivered code — 7 of 7 checks answered yes.
- !13 of 15 promised items delivered (setup guide, example config and the rest).
- ✓Security scored 87/100 with no failing check.
- !2 open warnings — explained in part 1.
AI code audit
The full source archive was read by our AI auditor against each check. It reads the code — it does not run it; running it is part 2.
| Check | What we found | Score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secrets & credentials | All secret-scan candidates are code (Password:[hidden], token variables, config() lookups) or generated at runtime, not committed values. The .env.example files use empty placeholders for APP_KEY, ADMIN_PASSWORD, Stripe, Aramex and reCAPTCHA. A few small points deserve a check: the demo password config, the [hidden] image in the tour file, and the truncated parts of the digest | 92 | Pass |
| Dependency vulnerabilities | Both composer.lock and package-lock.json are present with exact versions pinned. The secret scan confirms 0 vulnerabilities reported in a project file. All production dependencies use stable releases with no wildcards or pre-release versions. | 100 | Pass |
| Authorisation & access control | The admin area uses a separate guard, a deny-by-default area map enforced by middleware, and a route-coverage test. The Backup controller adds its own Owner check on top, and passwords are hashed. The digest does not include a project file, the storefront routes or the order/return controllers, so ownership checks on id lookups could not be traced and the score is capped slightly below 100. | 90 | Pass |
| Database access rules | In the files provided, queries use fixed periods, validated inputs and route constraints, and nothing is concatenated from user input. However, the migrations, seeders, schema.sql, models and the traffic/backup services were not included, so foreign keys, indexes and raw SQL elsewhere could not be verified. The score is capped until those can be reviewed. | 80 | Warning |
| Code structure & duplication | The digest shows a clear layout: services, actions, requests, and enums are split by concern, and the thin controllers delegate to services. The main structural weakness is the Owner-only check written as an inline middleware closure and repeated across controllers, plus a few hard-coded values that belong in config. | 84 | Pass |
| Build reproducibility | The project has committed lockfiles, pinned framework versions (Laravel 12.69.2, PHP 8.2+ platform), a Docker quick start and a README that points to HowToSetup.md. HowToSetup.md, docker-compose.yml and composer.json were not shown in full, so the step order, prerequisites and database creation could not be confirmed. A few small inconsistencies and gaps lower the score. | 80 | Warning |
Open warnings
Problems that did not stop the listing. They stay on the product page until a later version fixes them.
The project has committed lockfiles, pinned framework versions (Laravel 12.69.2, PHP 8.2+ platform), a Docker quick start and a README that points to HowToSetup.md. HowToSetup.md, docker-compose.yml and composer.json were not shown in full, so the step order, prerequisites and database creation could not be confirmed. A few small inconsistencies and gaps lower the score.
In the files provided, queries use fixed periods, validated inputs and route constraints, and nothing is concatenated from user input. However, the migrations, seeders, schema.sql, models and the traffic/backup services were not included, so foreign keys, indexes and raw SQL elsewhere could not be verified. The score is capped until those can be reviewed.
Requirement list
What the builder agreed to deliver before uploading — 13 of 15 met.
- Complete source for every component Met
- No real credentials in the archive Partial
- Builds from a clean machine Partial
- Database script or migrations Met
- Authentication and roles on every mutating endpoint Met
- Pinned dependencies without critical CVEs (nice)Met
- Documentation set (nice)Met
- Working live demo Met
- README.md Met
- HowToSetup.md Met
- CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md) (nice)Met
- CHANGELOG.md (nice)Met
- .env.example Met
- a project file Met
- a project file (nice)Met
Human review
Reviewers from the Vibe96 team in Dubai worked through each question below; a final reviewer signed it off.
Stage 1 — Installed and run from the delivered code
Completed 6 Nov 2026A reviewer installed the product on a clean machine, following only the guide that ships with it.
| Question | Answer | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|
| Packages restored without errors | Yes | |
| Solution builds clean | Yes | |
| Database created from the shipped script or migrations | Yes | |
| First sign-in works with the documented steps | Yes | |
| Setup guide is accurate and complete | Yes | |
| Every module in the feature list opens and works | Yes | |
| No real secrets in the archive | Yes | |
| Branding and company details can be changed without code | Yes |
Stage 2 — Live demo compared with the delivered code
Completed 6 Nov 2026A second reviewer checked that what the listing and demo show is what the buyer receives.
| Question | Answer | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|
| Demo URL is reachable | Yes | |
| Demo credentials work | Yes | |
| Demo runs the same version as the archive | Yes | |
| All five differentiators are visible in the demo | Yes | |
| Screenshots match the demo | Yes | |
| Nothing in the demo is missing from the code | Yes | |
| Datasheet claims are accurate | Yes |
Changes asked for during review
- None — approved on the first round.
- Sign-off: approved for sale on 6 Nov 2026 with 2 warnings shown publicly.
What this report covers — and what it doesn't
- It covers version 1.4.0 exactly as the buyer downloads it: the source archive, the setup guide and the live demo on the dates above.
- It is not a penetration test, a performance or load test, or a legal review of third-party package licences.
- Scores are a point in time. Libraries age; a later version is audited again and gets its own report.
- Your setup matters. Hosting, configuration and changes made after purchase are outside this review.
- How the score is made: each AI check is scored 0–100 and weighted (security counts most). A listing needs 75 or more, no failing check, and the human review passed.
- Always try the live demo before buying, and ask the builder questions from the product page.
Report history
| Report | Version | Date | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QR-26-00108 | 1.4.0 | 6 Nov 2026 | 87 | Current |
| QR-26-00019 | 1.2.0 | 6 Oct 2026 | 94 | Replaced |
| QR-26-00002 | 1.0.0 | 4 Oct 2026 | 93 | Replaced |
Vibe96 FZ-LLC, Dubai, UAE. This report describes the product at the time of review and is not a warranty.